A Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Structured teaching programme on knowledge and Expressed Practice Regarding Sanitary Napkin among School Girls Those Who Attained Menarche at a Selected School in Akola District
Dipali Bobade
HOD of Community Health Nursing Samarth Nursing College, Akola, Maharashtra, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: samrtha.college@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
School life is the first experience of living outside the home which would the school children to prepare themselves to lead a life, according to their growth and development and changing needs of the society. School is the best forum for the students to acquire knowledge, skill and attitude in various aspects of their life style pattern. The health of the child is the basement for healthy nation. In the school life the concept of prevention and health promotion are inevitable to bring the child with a good health. The personal hygiene is the fundamental step for the children to learn in order to prevent diseases and promote health. Methodology: A quantitative research approach was used for this study. A pre-experimental one group pre and post-test design was chosen. The sample selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria in selected school. The sample size was adopted for the study is 50 school girls those who attained menarche aged between 12 and14 years and studying in VIII (or) IX standard in Govt. Higher secondary school Result: 50 school girls the distribution of health-related variables among school girls with regard to the age at menarche 26(52%) and 24(48%) participants were aged between 12.1-13 years and 13.1-14 years respectively. Regarding nature of practice during menstruation, 25(50%) used cloth, 20(40%) used sanitary napkins and, 5(10%) used others. While looking the frequency of changing napkin per day, most of them 25(50%) change the napkin once a day, 17(34%) change the napkin twice a day, 8(16%) change the napkin thrice a day and above. Regarding perception of pain during menstruation it was found that 25(50%) never feels pain, 17(34%) sometimes feels pain and 8(16%) always feels pain. The most of the study participants 25(50%) had the source of water supply from well,18(36%) had from the municipal water, 7(14%) had from bore water. Regarding methods of disposal 25(50%) were directly burn,15(30%) were throw outside and 10(20%) were dumped. With regard to usage of toilet practices 30(60%) adapted open field defecation and 20(40%) adapted sanitary latrine practices. Conclusion: The study finding proved that the structured teaching programme administered by the researcher was effective to increase the knowledge and practice regarding sanitary napkin among school girls.
KEYWORDS: Structured Teaching Programme, Expressed Practice, Sanitary Napki, Menarche.
INTRODUCTION:
To highlight the menstrual hygiene awareness among girls 28th May is observed as menstrual hygiene day, which aims to break taboos and raise awareness about the importance of good menstrual hygiene management for women and adolescent girls worldwid
NEED FOR THE STUDY:
Menstrual hygiene is important to be practiced by the school girls to promote their health and prevent illness. Inadequate menstrual hygiene management is connected with the use of cloth, ashes and husk sand during menstruation, thereby it causes severe reproductive health problem. According to World Health Organization (2015) there are about 74% of schoolgirls had suffered with reproductive tract infection due to improper menstrual hygiene. The poor menstrual hygienic practices also leads to several problem among school girls which include dropped out from the school, inability to continue the education and reduction of self-esteem. It occurs because the school girls don’t practice menstrual hygiene and don’t have accessibility for sanitary napkin. The biggest barrier to adopt the quality of sanitary napkin in India are lack of affordability and accessibility as reported by In Derjeet Singh (2013) there are about 70% of school girls and their the family cannot affords sanitary napkin. It is further supported by the report of Times of India (2014) which unveiled that 50% of the school girls who dropped out the school in secondary classes are due to lack of sanitary napkin, coupled with lack of separate toilet facilities and water resources within the school campus. Thus the lack of knowledge on menstrual hygiene practice and sanitary napkin are the major cause for absenteeism among school girls.
METHODOLOGY:
A quantitative research approach was used for this study. Research design adopted was pre experimental one group pretest and post test method. The sample selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria in selected school. The sample size was adopted for the study is 50 School girls those who attained menarche aged between 12and14 years and studying in VIII(or) IX standard in Govt. Higher Secondary School. Sample technique used for the study Purposive sampling technique. Structured questionnaire was used to assess the knowledge of the school girls and Assessment of expressed practice. Questionnaire is considered as the most appropriate instrument to elicit the response from the literate subjects. The study proceeded after the sanction by institutional ethic committee and permission was opted from the government officials to conduct the study in selected school. Informed consent was taken from all the participants and confidentiality and anonymity was maintain throughout the procedure. Tool used for the study was divided under four sections with consent forms.
RESULTS:
Section–A:
Table 1: Distribution of demographic variables among school girls N=50
|
S. No. |
Demographic Variables |
N |
% |
|
|
1. |
Age in years |
12.1-13years |
24 |
48 |
|
13.1-14years |
26 |
52 |
||
|
2. |
Education |
VIII standard |
26 |
52 |
|
I X standard |
24 |
48 |
||
|
3. |
Religion |
Hindu |
14 |
28 |
|
Christian |
14 |
28 |
||
|
Muslim |
10 |
20 |
||
|
Others[specify] |
12 |
24 |
||
|
4. |
Type of family |
Nuclear family |
20 |
40 |
|
Joint family |
17 |
34 |
||
|
Broken family |
13 |
26 |
||
|
5. |
Residence |
Urban |
21 |
42 |
|
Rural |
29 |
58 |
||
|
6. |
Educational Status of father |
Illiterate |
22 |
44 |
|
Primary |
15 |
30 |
||
|
High school |
5 |
10 |
||
|
Higher secondary |
4 |
8 |
||
|
Graduate |
4 |
8 |
||
|
7. |
Educational status of mother |
Illiterate |
23 |
46 |
|
Primary |
14 |
28 |
||
|
High school |
6 |
12 |
||
|
Higher secondary |
4 |
8 |
||
|
Graduate |
3 |
6 |
||
|
8. |
Occupational status of father |
Employed |
25 |
50 |
|
Unemployed |
16 |
32 |
||
|
Self-employed |
9 |
18 |
||
|
9. |
Occupational status of mother |
Employed |
26 |
52 |
|
Unemployed |
17 |
34 |
||
|
Self-employed |
7 |
14 |
||
|
10. |
Family income per month (Rs.) |
Upto5,000 |
23 |
46 |
|
5,001to7,500 |
17 |
34 |
||
|
7,501to10,000 |
5 |
10 |
||
|
Morethan10,000 |
5 |
10 |
||
|
11. |
Number of siblings |
1 |
25 |
50 |
|
2 |
16 |
32 |
||
|
3 |
9 |
18 |
||
|
12. |
Source of information |
Mother |
21 |
42 |
|
Relatives |
17 |
34 |
||
|
Mass media |
4 |
8 |
||
|
Friends |
8 |
16 |
||
The table depicts the distribution of demographic variables among schoolgirls:
It reveals that among 50 school girls, 24(48%) were in age group of 12.1-13 and 26(52%) of them were in the age group of 13.1-14 years. With regard to the education of the girls, 26(52%) were in VIII standard and 24(48%) were in IX standard, Most of the 14(28%) belongs to Hindu, 14(28%) belongs to Christian, 10(20%) belongs to Muslim and 12(24%) belongs to others.
Distribution of regarding type of family revealed that most of the 20(40%) were in Nuclear Family, 17(34%) were in Joint Family and, 13(26%) were in Broken Family. Most of the 21(42%) had their residence in urban and 29(58%) were in rural area.
The level of education of father revealed that 22(44%) were illiterates, 15(30%) had primary education,5(10%) had high school education and, 4(8%) had Higher Secondary school education and 4(8%) were graduate.
The educational status of mother revealed that 23(46%) were illiterates, and 14(28%) had primary education out of 50 participants 6(12%) 4(8%) and 3(6%) had high school education, higher secondary school education and under graduation respectively.
Occupational status of father revealed that 25(50%) were employed,16(32%) were unemployed, 9(18%) were self-employed. Occupational status of mother revealed that most of the 26(52%) were employed, 17(34%) were unemployed and 7(14%) were self-employed.
Among 50 school girls 23(46%) had a monthly income up to Rs.5, 000, 17(14%) of them had a monthly income between Rs.5001 to 7500, 5(10%) of them had a monthly income of Rs.7501 to Rs.1000, and remaining 5(10%) had a monthly income above Rs.10000. With regard of number of sibling 25(50%) had one sibling, 16(32%) had two siblings and, 9(18%) had three and above.
With regard to source of information regarding health 21(42%) participants got the information by mother, 17(34%) by relatives, 4(8%) by mass media and 8(16%) by friends.
Table 2: Distribution of health related variables among schoolgirls
N= 50
|
S. No. |
Health related variables |
N |
% |
|
|
1 |
Age at menarche |
12.1-13years |
26 |
52 |
|
13.1-14years |
24 |
48 |
||
|
2 |
Nature of practice during menstruation |
Cloth |
25 |
50 |
|
Sanitary napkin |
20 |
40 |
||
|
Others |
5 |
10 |
||
|
3 |
Frequency of changing napkin per day |
Once a day |
25 |
50 |
|
Twice a day |
17 |
34 |
||
|
Thrice a day and above |
8 |
16 |
||
|
4 |
Perception of pain during menstruation |
Never |
25 |
50 |
|
Sometimes |
17 |
34 |
||
|
Always |
8 |
16 |
||
|
5 |
Source of water supply |
Well Water |
25 |
50 |
|
Municipal Water |
18 |
36 |
||
|
Bore Water |
7 |
14 |
||
|
6 |
Methods of disposal |
Directly burn |
25 |
50 |
|
Throw outside |
15 |
30 |
||
|
Dumped |
10 |
20 |
||
|
7 |
Toilet practice |
Open Field |
30 |
60 |
|
Sanitary latrine |
20 |
40 |
||
The above table depicts the distribution of health related variables among school girls with regard to the age at menarche 26(52%) and 24(48%) participants were aged between 12.1-13 years and 13.1-14 years respectively.
Regarding nature of practice during menstruation, 25(50%) used cloth, 20(40%) used sanitary napkins and, 5(10%) used others.
While looking the frequency of changing napkin per day, most of them 25(50%) change the napkin once a day, 17(34%) change the napkin twice a day,8(16%) change the napkin thrice a day and above.
Regarding perception of pain during menstruation it was found that 25(50%) never feels pain, 17(34%) sometimes feels pain and 8(16%) always feels pain.
The most of the study participants 25(50%) had the source of water supply from well,18(36%) had from the municipal water,7(14%) had from bore water.
Regarding methods of disposal 25(50%) were directly burn,15(30%) were throw outside and 10(20%) were dumped.
With regard to usage of toilet practices 30(60%) adapted open field defecation and 20(40%) adapted sanitary latrine practices.
Section-B
Table 3: Distribution of level of knowledge regarding sanitary napkin among school girls in pre and post test N=50
|
S. No. |
Level of knowledge |
Pre-test |
Post-test |
||
|
N |
% |
N |
% |
||
|
1 |
In adequate knowledge |
48 |
96 |
- |
- |
|
2 |
Moderately adequate knowledge |
2 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
|
3 |
Adequate knowledge |
- |
- |
47 |
94 |
|
Total |
50 |
100 |
50 |
100 |
|
The above table reveals that 48(96%) and 2(4%) participants in pre-test had inadequate and moderately adequate knowledge respectively. In post-test 47(94%) and 3(6%) study participants had adequate knowledge and moderately adequate knowledge respectively.
Fig. No. 1: Percentage distribution of level of knowledge regarding sanitary napkin among schoolgirls.
Table 4: Distribution of level of expressed practice regarding sanitary napkin among school girls in pre and post test N=50
|
S. No. |
Level of practice |
Pre-test |
Post-test |
||
|
N |
% |
N |
% |
||
|
1 |
In adequate practice |
42 |
84 |
5 |
10 |
|
2 |
Moderately adequate practice |
8 |
16 |
12 |
24 |
|
3 |
Adequate practice |
- |
- |
33 |
66 |
|
Total |
50 |
100 |
50 |
100 |
|
The above table reveals that 42(84%) and 8(16%) if study girls participants had inadequate and moderately adequate practice respectively in pre-test. In post-test 33(66%) and 12(24%) had adequate practice and moderately adequate practice and only 5 (10%) had inadequate knowledge among study participants respectively.
Fig. No. 2: Percentage is attribution
of level of expressed practice regarding sanitary napkin among school girls.
Section-C:
Table 5: Comparison of pre and post-test knowledge score regarding sanitary napkin among school girls N=50
|
S. No. |
Observation |
Mean |
SD |
Paired ‘t’ value |
p-value |
|
1 |
Pre-test |
6.62 |
1.86 |
38.339*** |
0.001 |
|
2 |
Post-test |
17.9 |
1.23 |
*** P <0.001
The above table unveils that there was a statistically significant difference between pre and post knowledge score regarding sanitary napkin among school girls at P<0.001.
Table 6: Comparison of pre and post-test expressed practice score regarding sanitary napkin among school girls N=50
|
S. No. |
Observation |
Mean |
SD |
Paired ‘t’ value |
p-value |
|
1 |
Pre-test |
6.48 |
3.62 |
13.504*** |
0.001 |
|
2 |
Post-test |
15.52 |
2.59 |
*** P<0.001
The above table illustrates that there was a statistically significant difference test between pre and post-test expressed practice score regarding sanitary napkin among school girls at P < 0.001.
Table 7: Association of socio demographic variables with level of knowledge regarding sanitary napkin among school girls N=50
|
S. No. |
Demographic variables |
Post-test knowledge score |
||||||||
|
Inadequate |
Moderatelyad equate |
Adequate |
chisquare |
Pvalue |
||||||
|
No |
% |
No |
% |
No |
% |
|
|
|||
|
1 |
Age in years |
12.1-13 |
- |
- |
2 |
4 |
22 |
44 |
0.446 NS |
0.504 |
|
13.1-14 |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
25 |
50 |
||||
|
2 |
Education |
VIII standard |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
24 |
48 |
1.051 NS |
0.789 |
|
IX standard |
- |
- |
2 |
4 |
23 |
46 |
||||
|
3 |
Religion |
Hindu |
- |
- |
- |
- |
14 |
28 |
5.374 NS |
0.146 |
|
Christian |
- |
- |
- |
- |
14 |
28 |
||||
|
Muslim |
- |
- |
2 |
4 |
8 |
16 |
||||
|
Others [specify] |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
11 |
22 |
||||
|
4 |
Type of family |
Nuclear family |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
19 |
38 |
0.102 NS |
0.95 |
|
Joint family |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
16 |
32 |
||||
|
Broken family |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
12 |
24 |
||||
|
5 |
Residence |
Urban |
- |
- |
3 |
6 |
26 |
52 |
2.311 NS |
0.128 |
|
Rural |
- |
- |
- |
- |
21 |
42 |
||||
|
6 |
Educational status of father |
Illiterate |
- |
- |
2 |
4 |
20 |
40 |
1.214 NS |
0.876 |
|
Primary |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
14 |
28 |
||||
|
High school |
- |
- |
- |
- |
5 |
10 |
||||
|
Higher secondary |
- |
- |
- |
- |
4 |
8 |
||||
|
Graduate |
- |
- |
- |
- |
4 |
8 |
||||
|
7 |
Educational status of Mother |
Illiterate |
- |
- |
3 |
6 |
20 |
40 |
3.747 NS |
0.441 |
|
Primary |
- |
- |
- |
- |
14 |
28 |
||||
|
High school |
- |
- |
- |
- |
6 |
12 |
||||
|
Higher secondary |
- |
- |
- |
- |
4 |
8 |
||||
|
Graduate |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3 |
6 |
||||
|
8 |
Occupational status of Father |
Employed |
- |
- |
- |
- |
25 |
50 |
6.782*SS |
0.034 |
|
Unemployed |
- |
- |
3 |
6 |
13 |
26 |
||||
|
Self-employed |
- |
- |
- |
- |
9 |
18 |
||||
|
9 |
Occupational Status of Mother |
Employed |
- |
- |
3 |
6 |
23 |
46 |
2.946 NS |
0.229 |
|
Unemployed |
- |
- |
- |
- |
17 |
34 |
||||
|
Self-employed |
- |
- |
- |
- |
7 |
14 |
||||
|
10 |
Family income per month (Rs.) |
Upto 5,000 |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
22 |
44 |
1.751 NS |
0.626 |
|
5,001to7500 |
- |
- |
2 |
4 |
15 |
30 |
||||
|
7,501to10,000 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
5 |
10 |
||||
|
Morethan10,000 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
5 |
10 |
||||
|
11 |
Number of sibling |
1 |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
24 |
48 |
1.95 NS |
0.377 |
|
2 |
- |
- |
2 |
4 |
14 |
28 |
||||
|
3andabove |
- |
- |
- |
- |
9 |
18 |
||||
|
12 |
Source of information |
Mother |
- |
- |
- |
- |
21 |
42 |
5.413 NS |
0.144 |
|
Relatives |
- |
- |
2 |
4 |
15 |
30 |
||||
|
Mass media |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
||||
|
Friends |
- |
- |
- |
- |
8 |
16 |
||||
The above table shows that there was a statistically significant association of occupational status of father with the level knowledge regarding sanitary napkin among study participants at level P<0.05
Table 8: Association of health-related variables with level of knowledge regarding sanitary napkin among school girls N=50
|
Sr. No. |
Health related variables |
Post-test knowledge score |
Chi Square |
P- value |
||||||
|
Inadequate |
Moderately Adequate |
Adequate |
||||||||
|
No |
% |
No |
% |
No |
% |
|||||
|
1 |
Age at menarche |
12.1-13years |
- |
- |
2 |
4 |
31 |
62 |
2.62 NS |
0.457 |
|
13.1-14years |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
16 |
32 |
||||
|
2 |
Nature of practice during menstruation |
Cloth |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
24 |
48 |
1.95 NS |
0.377 |
|
Sanitary napkin |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
19 |
38 |
||||
|
Others |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
4 |
8 |
||||
|
3 |
Frequency of changing napkin per day |
Once a day |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
24 |
48 |
6.383* SS |
0.041 |
|
Twice a day |
- |
- |
- |
- |
17 |
34 |
||||
|
Thrice a day and above |
- |
- |
2 |
4 |
6 |
12 |
||||
|
4 |
Perception of pain during menstruation |
Never |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
24 |
48 |
0.777 NS |
0.678 |
|
Sometimes |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
16 |
32 |
||||
|
Always |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
7 |
14 |
||||
|
5 |
Source of water supply |
Well water |
- |
- |
3 |
6 |
22 |
44 |
3.191 NS |
0.203 |
|
Municipal water |
- |
- |
- |
- |
18 |
36 |
||||
|
Bore water |
- |
- |
- |
- |
7 |
14 |
||||
|
6 |
Methods of disposal |
Directly burn |
- |
- |
- |
- |
25 |
50 |
5.083 NS |
0.079 |
|
Throw out side |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
14 |
28 |
||||
|
Dumped |
- |
- |
2 |
4 |
8 |
16 |
||||
|
7 |
Toilet practice |
Open field |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
29 |
58 |
0.946 NS |
0.331 |
|
Sanitary latrine |
- |
- |
2 |
4 |
18 |
36 |
||||
NS=not significant SS= statistically significant *P<0.05
The above table shows that there was a statistically association of frequency of changing napkin with level of knowledge regarding sanitary napkin among study participants at level P<0.05.
Table 9: Association of demographic variables with level of expressed practice regarding sanitary napkin among school girls N=50
|
S. No. |
Demographic variables |
Post-test expressed practice score |
Chi square |
P-value |
||||||
|
Inadequate |
Moderatel adequate |
Adequate |
||||||||
|
No |
% |
No |
% |
No |
% |
|||||
|
1 |
Age in years |
12.1-13 |
3 |
6 |
6 |
12 |
15 |
30 |
0.393 NS |
0.821 |
|
13.1-14 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
12 |
18 |
36 |
||||
|
2 |
Education |
VIII standard |
3 |
6 |
4 |
8 |
21 |
42 |
10.657 NS |
0.167 |
|
IX standard |
2 |
4 |
8 |
16 |
12 |
24 |
||||
|
3 |
Religion |
Hindu |
2 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
9 |
18 |
2.922 NS |
0.819 |
|
Christian |
2 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
10 |
20 |
||||
|
Muslim |
- |
- |
3 |
6 |
7 |
14 |
||||
|
Others[specify] |
1 |
2 |
4 |
8 |
7 |
14 |
||||
|
4 |
Type of family |
Nuclear family |
1 |
2 |
4 |
8 |
15 |
30 |
9.263 NS |
0.321 |
|
Joint family |
2 |
4 |
5 |
10 |
10 |
20 |
||||
|
Broken family |
2 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
8 |
16 |
||||
|
5 |
Residence |
Urban |
3 |
6 |
7 |
14 |
19 |
38 |
0.011 NS |
0.994 |
|
Rural |
2 |
4 |
5 |
10 |
14 |
28 |
||||
|
6 |
Educational status of Father |
Illiterate |
1 |
2 |
4 |
8 |
17 |
34 |
9.263 NS |
0.321 |
|
Primary |
4 |
8 |
4 |
8 |
7 |
14 |
||||
|
High school |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
4 |
8 |
||||
|
Higher secondary |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
||||
|
Graduate |
- |
- |
2 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
||||
|
7 |
Educational Status of Mother |
Illiterate |
2 |
4 |
4 |
8 |
17 |
34 |
5.077 NS |
0.749 |
|
Primary |
1 |
2 |
5 |
10 |
8 |
16 |
||||
|
High school |
1 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
||||
|
Higher secondary |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
||||
|
Graduate |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3 |
6 |
||||
|
8 |
Occupational Status of Father |
Employed |
3 |
6 |
5 |
10 |
17 |
34 |
0.911 NS |
0.923 |
|
Unemployed |
1 |
2 |
5 |
10 |
10 |
20 |
||||
|
Self-employed |
1 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
12 |
||||
|
9 |
Occupational Status of Mother |
Employed |
3 |
6 |
5 |
10 |
18 |
36 |
1.122 NS |
0.891 |
|
Unemployed |
1 |
2 |
5 |
10 |
11 |
22 |
||||
|
Self-employed |
1 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
8 |
||||
|
10 |
Family income per month (Rs.) |
Upto5,000 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
8 |
17 |
34 |
3.283 NS |
0.773 |
|
5,001to7500 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
10 |
11 |
22 |
||||
|
7,501to10,000 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
||||
|
More than10,000 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
||||
|
11 |
Number of sibling |
1 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
10 |
17 |
34 |
2.064 NS |
0.724 |
|
2 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
10 |
9 |
18 |
||||
|
3 and above |
- |
- |
2 |
4 |
7 |
14 |
||||
|
12 |
Source of information |
Mother |
3 |
6 |
4 |
8 |
14 |
28 |
7.022 NS |
0.319 |
|
Relatives |
- |
- |
7 |
14 |
10 |
20 |
||||
|
Mass media |
1 |
2 |
- |
- |
3 |
6 |
||||
|
Friends |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
12 |
||||
The above table shows that there was no association of demographic variables with level of expressed practice of regarding sanitary napkin, among study participants.
Table 10: Association of health-related variables with level of expressed practice regarding sanitary napkin among school girls N=50
|
S. No |
Health related variables |
Post-test expressed practice score |
Chi Square |
P-value |
||||||
|
Inadequate |
Moderately Adequate |
Adequate |
||||||||
|
No |
% |
No |
% |
No |
% |
|||||
|
1 |
Age at menarche |
12.1-13 Years |
2 |
4 |
4 |
8 |
21 |
42 |
7.216 NS |
0.301 |
|
13.1-14 Years |
3 |
6 |
8 |
16 |
12 |
24 |
||||
|
2 |
Nature of practice during menstruation |
Cloth |
3 |
6 |
5 |
10 |
17 |
34 |
1.373 NS |
0.849 |
|
Sanitary Napkin |
2 |
4 |
6 |
12 |
12 |
24 |
||||
|
Others |
- |
- |
1 |
2 |
4 |
8 |
||||
|
3 |
Frequency of changing napkin per day |
Once a day |
3 |
6 |
8 |
16 |
14 |
28 |
2.591 NS |
0.628 |
|
Twice a day |
1 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
13 |
26 |
||||
|
Thrice a day and above |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
12 |
||||
|
4 |
Perception of pain during menstruation |
Never |
2 |
4 |
5 |
10 |
18 |
36 |
1.43 NS |
0.839 |
|
Sometimes |
2 |
4 |
4 |
8 |
11 |
22 |
||||
|
Always |
1 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
8 |
||||
|
5 |
Source of water supply |
Well water |
3 |
6 |
5 |
10 |
17 |
34 |
1.018 NS |
0.907 |
|
Municipal Water |
1 |
2 |
5 |
10 |
12 |
24 |
||||
|
Bore water |
1 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
8 |
||||
|
6 |
Methods of disposal |
Directly burn |
5 |
10 |
7 |
14 |
13 |
26 |
6.818 N S |
0.146 |
|
Throw Outside |
- |
- |
3 |
6 |
12 |
24 |
||||
|
Dumped |
- |
- |
2 |
4 |
8 |
16 |
||||
|
7 |
Toilet practice |
Open field |
2 |
4 |
9 |
18 |
19 |
38 |
2.039 NS |
0.361 |
|
Sanitary Latrine |
3 |
6 |
3 |
6 |
14 |
28 |
||||
The above table shows that there was no association between health related variables and level of expressed practice regarding sanitary napkin among study participants.
DISCUSSION:
This chapter deals with the discussion which was based on the objectives, findings obtained from the data analysis and its relation to the subjects of the study, the conceptual framework and with the revealed literature. The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of structured teaching programme on knowledge and practice regarding sanitary napkin among school girls those who attained menarche at a selected school in Akola District. The study findings are discussed based on the following objectives. The distribution of 24(48%) participant were in age groupof12.1-13 years and 26(52%) of them were in the age group of 13.1-14 years With regard to the education of the school girls 26 (52%) were in VIII standard, 24(48%) were in IX standard. Each 14(28%) belongs to Hindu, 14(28%) belongs to Christian and only, 10(20%) belongs to Muslim, 12(24%) belongs to others. Type of family revealed that most of the20 (40%) were in Nuclear family, 17(34%) were in joint family and 13(26%) were in broken family. Mostofthe21(42%) had their residence in urban and 29 (58%) were in rural area. The educational status of father revealed that 22(44%) have illiterates, 15(30%) had primary school 5(10%) had high school 4(8%) had higher secondary school and 4(8%) were graduates. The educational status of mother revealed that 23(46%) were illiterates, 14(28%) were primary school 6(12%) had high school 4(8%) had higher secondary school and 3(6%) were graduates. Occupational status of father revealed that 25(50%) were employed, 16(32%) were unemployed and 9(18%) were self-employed. Occupational status of mother revealed that 26(52%) were employed, 16(32%) were unemployed and 7(14%) were self-employed regarding family income 23(46%) had a monthly income up to Rs.5000/-, 17(34%) of them had a monthly income between Rs.5001 to 7500, 5(10%) of them had a monthly income of Rs.7501 to 10000, and remaining 5(10%) had a monthly income above Rs.10000/-
With regard of number of siblings 25(50%) had one sibling, 16(32%) had two siblings and 9(18%) had three and above siblings. With regard to source of information regarding health21 (42%) received it by mother, 17(34%) by relatives, 4(8%) by mass media and 8(16%) by friends The distribution of age at menarche disclosed that 26(52%) were between 12.1-13 years and 24(48%) were between 13.1-14 years. Regarding nature of practice during menstruation, 25(50%) used cloth 20(40%) used sanitary napkin and, 5(10%) used others. While looking at the frequency of changing napkin per day, most of the 25(50%) changed their napkin once a day, 17(34%) changed their napkin twice a day and 8(16%) changed their napkin thrice a day and above. Regarding perception of pain during menstruation it was found that 25(50%) never perceived pain, 17(34%) sometimes perceived pain and 8(16%) always perceived pain Regarding the methods of disposal 25(50%) were directly burn 15(30%) were throw out side and 10(20%) were dumped. With regard to usage of toilet practices 30(60%) adapted open field defecation and 20(40%) adapted sanitary latrine practices. There was a statistically significant association of frequency of changing napkin per day with level of knowledge among study participants regarding sanitary napkin at level P<0.05.The paired “t” value on comparison of pre and post test scores of level of knowledge and expressed practice regarding sanitary napkin within study participant unveiled the statistically significant difference at level P<0.001.There was a statistically significant association of occupational status of father with level of knowledge regarding sanitary napkin among study participants at level P<0.05There was a statistically significant association of frequency of changing napkin with level of knowledge among study participants regarding sanitary napkin at level P<0.05.
CONCLUSION:
The study concluded that the structured teaching programme was effective in enhancing the knowledge and improving the expressed practices regarding sanitary napkin usage among school girls who had attained menarche. There was a significant improvement in both knowledge and hygienic practices post-intervention, indicating the positive impact of structured education in promoting menstrual hygiene among adolescent girls. This emphasizes the need for incorporating such educational programmes in schools to ensure better menstrual health and awareness. he findings of the study clearly indicate that the structured teaching programme had a significant positive impact on the knowledge and expressed practices of school girls regarding sanitary napkin use and menstrual hygiene. Prior to the intervention, many participants demonstrated inadequate knowledge and incorrect practices related to menstrual hygiene, which could potentially lead to health risks such as infections and discomfort.
After the implementation of the structured teaching programme, there was a marked improvement in their understanding of menstruation, proper usage and disposal of sanitary napkins, personal hygiene measures during menstruation, and awareness of the importance of maintaining cleanliness. The programme not only filled the knowledge gaps but also helped in changing the attitude and improving hygienic practices among the girls. This highlights the importance of menstrual health education, especially among adolescent girls who have recently attained menarche. Providing accurate information through structured programmers in schools can empower girls to manage their menstruation with dignity and confidence, reduce absenteeism during periods, and promote long-term reproductive health. Therefore, it is recommended that such structured educational interventions be regularly conducted in schools as part of health education curriculum to ensure a well-informed and healthy generation of young women.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
the researcher would like to acknowledge the ethical committee and selected school and the all participants for their support in the study.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES:
1. Abioye-Kuteyi, E.A. (2000). Menstrual knowledge and practices amongst secondary school girls Ile Ife, Nigeria. Journal of Research Society Promotional Health, 120(1): 23-26.
2. Adhikari, P., Kadel, B., Dhungel, S.I., and Mandal, A. (2007). Knowledge and practice regarding menstrual hygiene in rural adolescent girls of Nepal. Kathmandu University Medical Journal, 5(3): 382-386.
3. AdrijaDatta, Nirmalya Manna, MousumiDatta, JhumaSarkar, BaijayantiBaur, and SaraswatiDatta. (2012). Menstruation and menstrual hygiene among adolescent girls of West Bengal, India: A school based comparative study. Global Journal of Medicine and Public Health, 1(5): 50-57.
4. Ali, T.S., and Rizvi, S.N. (2010). Menstrual knowledge and practicesof female adolescents in urban Karachi, Pakistan. Journal ofAdolescence, 33(4): 531
|
Received on 12.04.2025 Revised on 29.04.2025 Accepted on 14.05.2025 Published on 21.05.2025 Available online from May 23, 2025 Int. J. of Advances in Nursing Management. 2025;13(2):115-122. DOI: 10.52711/2454-2652.2025.00023 ©A and V Publications All right reserved
|
|
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License. |
|